Compare Fusio to Ghost

This page compares Fusio, an open-source API management platform for building and managing structured APIs, with Ghost, an open-source headless content management system (CMS) and professional publishing platform. Although both support APIs, they serve different needs: Fusio focuses on general API lifecycle and backend services, while Ghost specializes in content publishing and headless delivery.

🔍 Feature Comparison

Feature Fusio Ghost
Type API management platform Headless CMS & publishing platform
Primary Use Case Design, secure, document, and manage REST APIs Publish, manage, and deliver content via API
Open Source ✅ Yes (Apache 2.0) ✅ Yes (MIT)
API Generation Manual definition + structured design Built-in REST JSON API for content
Documentation Auto-generated OpenAPI API docs available, not auto OpenAPI
Authentication & Security Built-in OAuth2 server API keys (Content API), JWT (Admin API)
Custom Logic PHP/JS/SQL actions Limited backend extensibility; content-focused logic
Content Management UI ⚠️ API-centric admin UI ✅ Full CMS UI for authors & editors
Real-Time ⚠️ Manual integrations ⚠️ Not core, some webhook support
Extensibility Plugins & custom actions Integrations, themes, webhooks
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted or Ghost(Pro) managed

🎯 Key Differences

The main difference between Fusio and Ghost lies in how they are designed to work and the type of backend workloads they solve.

Fusio is a full API management platform that gives developers control over API design, security, governance, and custom behavior:

  • Create and manage structured REST APIs with detailed schemas
  • Centralize API security with built-in OAuth2 and scopes
  • Generate OpenAPI documentation automatically
  • Execute backend logic using PHP, JavaScript, or SQL actions
  • Provide lifecycle, access control, and developer workflows

Fusio is optimized for building general-purpose APIs and backend services, where logic, security, and governance are key.

Ghost is a headless content management and publishing platform that delivers content via a RESTful JSON API:

  • Manage content (posts, pages, tags, authors) via the admin UI
  • Expose data through a read-only Content API and write-enabled Admin API
  • Designed for publishing workflows and editorial teams
  • Integrates smoothly with frontend frameworks (Next.js, Gatsby) via API
  • Includes features like SEO, newsletters, memberships (on managed Ghost(Pro))

Ghost is ideal for content delivery and publishing, not general API management.

📌 When to Choose Which

Choose Fusio if:

  • You need a backend platform that centralizes API governance, security, and custom logic
  • Building structured APIs for a wide range of services (not just content) is your priority
  • You want built-in API management features like OAuth2, scopes, and autogenerated documentation
  • Your APIs are consumed by external developers or systems, not just frontends

Fusio is best for teams looking to build API products, backend services, or integration platforms.

Choose Ghost if:

  • You want a headless CMS tailored for content publishing and delivery
  • You need a rich editorial UI for authors together with a backend API
  • Your project revolves around creating posts, pages, magazines, blogs, or newsletters
  • You plan to serve content to web apps, static sites, or mobile apps via API

Ghost is ideal for content-centric applications and modern headless publishing.

part of the Apioo-Project